Maybe this can help to solve the issue

I also noted that   XMLRPC libraries   is not statically link

this is what I got running ldd   on moses first   and mosesserve
ldd moses       
        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff3f3a1000)
        librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003620a00000)
        libSegFault.so => /lib64/libSegFault.so (0x00007fc75f667000)
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003620e00000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003620200000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003621200000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x000000361fe00000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x000000361f600000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000361f200000)

ldd   mosesserver 
        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fffa59ff000)
        librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003620a00000)
        libSegFault.so => /lib64/libSegFault.so (0x00007f70dbc55000)
        libxmlrpc_server_abyss++.so.4 => not found
        libxmlrpc_server++.so.4 => not found
        libxmlrpc_server_abyss.so.3 => not found
        libxmlrpc_server.so.3 => not found
        libxmlrpc_abyss.so.3 => not found
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x000000361fe00000)
        libxmlrpc++.so.4 => not found
        libxmlrpc.so.3 => not found
        libxmlrpc_util.so.3 => not found
        libxmlrpc_xmlparse.so.3 => not found
        libxmlrpc_xmltok.so.3 => not found
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003620e00000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003620200000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003621200000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x000000361f600000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000361f200000)



Nicola



On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:41 AM, Kenneth Heafield wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>       Ugh sorry something was weird with bjam.  I've put a kludge in that
> forces static linkage unless link=shared appears on the command line.
> 
> Kenneth
> 
> On 08/26/13 21:59, Lane Schwartz wrote:
>> I'm attempting to compile Moses in such a way that at least the boost
>> libraries are statically compiled. I'm fine if other libraries are shared.
>> 
>> My interpretation of this thread (and BUILD-INSTRUCTIONS.txt) is that if
>> I compile boost (following instructions in BUILD-INSTRUCTIONS.txt) so
>> that it makes available static versions of its libraries, then compile
>> moses using link=static, boost should be statically linked with moses.
>> Unfortunately, that doesn't appear to be happening for me:
>> 
>> ./bjam link=static -j8 --with-cmph=/tools/moses/cmph-2.0
>> --with-srilm=/tools/SRILM/SRILM-1.7.0
>> --with-boost=/tools/moses/boost_1_53_0 -q --debug-configuration -d2
>> 
>> The log for the above is attached. If I try running moses after this
>> compile (without adding /tools/moses/boost_1_53_0 to LIBRARY_PATH and
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH), I get the following error:
>> 
>> ./bin/moses: error while loading shared libraries:
>> libboost_system-mt.so.1.53.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
>> file or directory
>> 
>> Running ldd on bin/moses confirms that there is a dynamic boost library
>> linking:
>> 
>> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff8adff000)
>> 
>> libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x0000003949200000)
>> 
>> librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003949600000)
>> 
>> libbz2.so.1 => /lib64/libbz2.so.1 (0x0000003955a00000)
>> 
>> libboost_system-mt.so.1.53.0 => not found
>> 
>> libSegFault.so => /lib64/libSegFault.so (0x00007f1671726000)
>> 
>> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x000000394fa00000)
>> 
>> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003948600000)
>> 
>> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x000000394d600000)
>> 
>> libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003948e00000)
>> 
>> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003948200000)
>> 
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003947e00000)
>> 
>> 
>> Looking in /tools/moses/boost_1_53_0/lib I can verify that the static .a
>> file exists:
>> 
>> 
>> libboost_system-mt.a
>> 
>> libboost_system-mt.so
>> 
>> libboost_system-mt.so.1.53.0
>> 
>> 
>> Any help would be appreciated. I'm attaching the compile log and a
>> listing of the boost files installed in /tools/moses/boost_1_53_0/lib.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Lane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Kenneth Heafield <mo...@kheafield.com
>> <mailto:mo...@kheafield.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Ok, committed.  Here's how the build system now behaves:
>> 
>>    link=shared: Everything linked dynamically.
>> 
>>    Default: internal libraries are statically linked.  Boost and zlib
>>    statically linked if possible.  libSegFault dynamically linked.
>>    Dynamically linked executable.
>> 
>>    --without-libsegfault: Same as default but no libSegFault.  Still a
>>    dynamically linked executable, even if you have static boost and zlib.
>>    It's complicated to do detect then be automatic.
>> 
>>    --static: No libSegFault.  Print warning messages if you're missing
>>    static libraries, but keep building anyway.  Static executable.
>> 
>>    Kenneth
>> 
>>    On 08/06/2012 12:00 PM, Kenneth Heafield wrote:
>>> D'oh, it's a feature, not a bug.  Add runtime-link=static and
>>    you'll get
>>> a fully-static executable.
>>> 
>>> Plan to add this to the Moses build system.  Testing now.
>>> 
>>> Kenneth
>>> 
>>> On 08/06/2012 11:31 AM, Tom Hoar wrote:
>>>> FYI, this build is on U-10.04.4 using the bjam shipped with
>>    Moses. I can
>>>> send you the complete log if it helps. Let me know if you need
>>    anything
>>>> else.
>>>> 
>>>> Tom
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:27:27 -0400, Kenneth Heafield
>>>> <mo...@kheafield.com <mailto:mo...@kheafield.com>>  wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> There appears to be a bug in boost-build that prevents it from
>>    making
>>>>> fully-static binaries with g++. This might take a while to sort out.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kenneth
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 08/06/2012 10:48 AM, Tom Hoar wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks, Ken. I think this is easier than adding another option
>>    to Moses
>>>>>> if we can understand the output. The ldd manpage says "ldd
>>    prints the
>>>>>> shared libraries required by each program or shared library
>>    specified on
>>>>>> the command line." I assume "shared libraries" means not statically
>>>>>> linked?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Here's the output on the moses I just built with today's github
>>    updates.
>>>>>> The log output reported exit code 0 for all lines with "g++
>>    -static".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> tahoar@library1:~$ ldd `which moses`
>>>>>> linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fffa2954000)
>>>>>> librt.so.1 =>  /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007f818aa7b000)
>>>>>> libstdc++.so.6 =>  /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f818a767000)
>>>>>> libm.so.6 =>  /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f818a4e3000)
>>>>>> libgcc_s.so.1 =>  /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f818a2cc000)
>>>>>> libpthread.so.0 =>  /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f818a0af000)
>>>>>> libc.so.6 =>  /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8189d2b000)
>>>>>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f818aca7000)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is this what I should expect if all of the libboost libraries are
>>>>>> statically linked? I think so because there are no references
>>    to the
>>>>>> lboost_* or lz libraries in the log file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:14:35 -0400, Kenneth Heafield
>>>>>> <mo...@kheafield.com <mailto:mo...@kheafield.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>> On linux,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ldd bin/moses
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 08/06/2012 10:03 AM, Tom Hoar wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thanks Ken. I downloaded/compiled with the latest changes up to
>>>>>>>> BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE. The exit code 1 disappeared and everything
>>    seems
>>>>>>>> okay.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> One more question. Other than the log output at compile time,
>>    is there
>>>>>>>> any way to query the Moses binary to see which libraries are
>>>>>>>> statically
>>>>>>>> vs dynamically linked?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> For example, a while back, someone on the list gave this
>>    command to
>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>> if the binary was compiled --with-srilm, and there are others for
>>>>>>>> IRSTLM, RANDLM and KENLM.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> nm -C "/path/to/moses" | grep "vtable for
>>    Moses::LanguageModelSRI"`
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I tried the obvious two grep searches "static" and "dynamic"
>>    (below),
>>>>>>>> but they don't seem to relate to the libraries. Does anyone
>>    know a way
>>>>>>>> to find/test if libraries are dynamically or statically linked?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> tahoar@library1:~/domy-2.5$ nm -C `which moses` | grep "static"
>>>>>>>> 00000000005ddbc0 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005de7c1 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005ded37 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005e0067 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005e2fc6 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005ecae3 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005ef140 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005f475f t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005f4cd9 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005f5e53 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005f6f8e t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 00000000005f7183 t
>>    __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)
>>>>>>>> 0000000000883cc0 d static_bl_desc
>>>>>>>> 0000000000883ca0 d static_d_desc
>>>>>>>> 0000000000610680 r static_dtree
>>>>>>>> 0000000000883c80 d static_l_desc
>>>>>>>> 0000000000610200 r static_ltree
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> tahoar@library1:~/domy-2.5$ nm -C `which moses` | grep "dynamic"
>>>>>>>> 0000000000570c50 W
>>>>>>>> 
>>    boost::unordered_detail::hash_table_unique_keys<std::pair<float const,
>>>>>>>> boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned
>>    long>
>>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>> float, boost::hash<float>, std::equal_to<float>,
>>>>>>>> std::allocator<std::pair<float const,
>>    boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned
>>>>>>>> long, std::allocator<unsigned long>  >  >  >
>>> ::operator[](float const&)
>>>>>>>> 000000000057baf0 W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>    
>> boost::unordered_detail::hash_table_data_unique_keys<std::allocator<std::pair<std::pair<unsigned
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> char, unsigned char>  const, boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned long,
>>>>>>>> std::allocator<unsigned long>  >  >  >
>>> ::~hash_table_data_unique_keys()
>>>>>>>> 0000000000570af0 W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>    
>> boost::unordered_detail::hash_table_data_unique_keys<std::allocator<std::pair<float
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> const, boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned long,
>>    std::allocator<unsigned
>>>>>>>> long>  >  >  >  >::create_buckets()
>>>>>>>> 0000000000570c00 W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>    
>> boost::unordered_detail::hash_table_data_unique_keys<std::allocator<std::pair<float
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> const, boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned long,
>>    std::allocator<unsigned
>>>>>>>> long>  >  >  >  >::node_constructor::~node_constructor()
>>>>>>>> 0000000000570b70 W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>    
>> boost::unordered_detail::hash_table_data_unique_keys<std::allocator<std::pair<float
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> const, boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned long,
>>    std::allocator<unsigned
>>>>>>>> long>  >  >  >  >::~hash_table_data_unique_keys()
>>>>>>>> 000000000057ba60 W
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>    
>> boost::unordered_detail::hash_table_data_unique_keys<std::allocator<std::pair<unsigned
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> int const, boost::dynamic_bitset<unsigned long,
>>>>>>>> std::allocator<unsigned
>>>>>>>> long>  >  >  >  >::~hash_table_data_unique_keys()
>>>>>>>> U __dynamic_cast@@CXXABI_1.3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 08:20:00 -0400, Kenneth Heafield
>>>>>>>> <mo...@kheafield.com <mailto:mo...@kheafield.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You're correct. There doesn't seem to be a static version of
>>    this
>>>>>>>>> library. I've added the --nosegfault option (which isn't as
>>    cool as
>>>>>>>>> it sounds) to skip this library.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Kenneth
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 08/06/2012 02:08 AM, Tom Hoar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I read the comment "In order to obtain a fully static Moses,
>>>>>>>>>> every g++
>>>>>>>>>> command line that includes "-static" must pass with exit
>>    code 0."
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> interest.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> When we compile moses, this log output line shows an exit
>>    code 1.
>>>>>>>>>> All
>>>>>>>>>> the others are 0.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> bash -c "g++ -static -lSegFault -x c++ -<<<'int main() {}' -o
>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null
>>>>>>>>>>> /dev/null 2>/dev/null"
>>>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions as to what's missing/how to correct so we
>>    have a
>>>>>>>>>> fully-static Moses?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:13:47 -0400, Kenneth Heafield
>>>>>>>>>> <mo...@kheafield.com <mailto:mo...@kheafield.com>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Moses attempts to link statically by default but falls back to
>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic
>>>>>>>>>>> links. You must have static versions of all the dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>> installed
>>>>>>>>>>> as well. Run
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> bjam --debug-configuration
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> and, near the top, it will show you some command lines
>>    followed by
>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>> exit code. In order to obtain a fully static Moses, every g++
>>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>> line that includes "-static" must pass with exit code 0.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Kenneth
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moses-support mailing list
>>> Moses-support@mit.edu <mailto:Moses-support@mit.edu>
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Moses-support mailing list
>>    Moses-support@mit.edu <mailto:Moses-support@mit.edu>
>>    http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> When a place gets crowded enough to require ID's, social collapse is not
>> far away.  It is time to go elsewhere.  The best thing about space travel
>> is that it made it possible to go elsewhere.
>>                -- R.A. Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> Moses-support@mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support


_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
Moses-support@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to