Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Philipp Koehn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the additional $input-extension in lines 750 and 758 in fact do not do
> anything, so they should be removed.
>
> I updated this.
>
> -phi
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Lane Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> One of the people in my lab has been attempting to add a custom
>> component to EMS. In trying to do this, we have uncovered what appears
>> to be an inconsistency in experiment.meta.
>>
>> Lines 750 (under split-input in [TUNING]) and 758 (under
>> split-input-devtest in [TUNING]) defines the template as:
>>
>> template: $input-splitter -model IN1.$input-extension $input-extension
>> < IN > OUT
>>
>>
>> However, these lines are in contrast to the templates on line 320
>> (under split-indomain-source in [MML]) and line 949 (under split-input
>> in [EVALUATION]) defined as:
>>
>> template: $input-splitter -model IN1.$input-extension < IN > OUT
>>
>>
>> We can't explain the above inconsistency. We are assuming that the
>> extra "$input-extension" right before "< IN" in lines 750 and 758
>> should be removed. Is that correct, or is there some other reason for
>> the extra $input-extension parameter that we're not seeing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lane
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moses-support mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
--
When a place gets crowded enough to require ID's, social collapse is not
far away. It is time to go elsewhere. The best thing about space travel
is that it made it possible to go elsewhere.
-- R.A. Heinlein, "Time Enough For Love"
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
