Hi,
I have been complaining about MGiza performance, too, lately. With more
cores it get's slower instead of faster, at least above 8 cores. If it
is slower than GIZA then this is really bad.
W dniu 2015-01-16 16:53, Li Xiang napisał(a):
> Hi all,
>
> I trained the alignment model on the same data with the same parameters using
> GIZA and MGIZA respectively. The training corpus includes 200K sentences. My
> server has an Intel Quad CPU i4790K which has 4 cores and each core has 2
> threads. It costs 2905 seconds for GIZA. But it costs 5259 seconds for MGIZA
> with 3 threads. I think MGIZA is much faster than GIZA. But I got bad result.
> I do not know the reason is the compile way or others.
>
> Does anyone has relative experience? Thanks.
>
> The following is the training command for MGIZA. And the training data is the
> FBIS zh-en data. But I can not public the data because of copyright.
>
> ${mosesScript}/training/train-model.perl
> --external-bin-dir "${binDir}"
> --root-dir "${trainDir}"
> --corpus train
> --f src
> --e ref
> --alignment grow-diag-final-and
> --parallel
> --first-step 1
> --last-step 3
> --mgiza --mgiza-cpus 3
> _______________________________________________
> Moses-support mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support [1]
Links:
------
[1] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
