Hi Erinç,
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:24 +0000, Matthias Huck wrote:
> I'd assume that your 32 entries of the n-best list weren't actually
> unique, though, but a number of duplicates of the (two) very same
> outputs, as "distinct" should simply avoid duplicate entries.
Actually, could you please check for us whether I'm right with this
assumption? If I'm not, then some other modification since version 2.1
might affect your experiment. I hope that's not the case.
Run something like
cut -d'|' -f4 | sort | uniq | wc -l
on the n-best list with 32 entries. It should print 2.
Or did you do this already? (You're mentioning "unique hypotheses" in
your mail.)
Cheers,
Matthias
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
