hI,

0.0001 should have no impact on translation quality,
0.001 will have some impact
0.01 is probably a bit too drastic.

But that's the range you should explore.

-phi

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Vincent Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:

> is there any benchmark on what value / what impact ?
> what should I start with as a test 0.001 ?
>
> the standard value 0.0001 seems really really low to me ....
> maybe I am not getting what this probability exactly refers to.
>
>
>
> where FIELDn is the position of the score (typically 2 for the direct
> phrase probability p(e|f), or 0 for the indirect phrase probability p(f|e))
> and THRESHOLD the maximum probability allowed. A good setting is 2:0.0001,
> which removes all rules, where the direct phrase translation probability is
> below 0.0001.
>
>
>
> Le 31/08/2015 16:14, Philipp Koehn a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I would suspect that with beam sizes <500 the bulk of the time is
> spent on translation option collection, not decoding. You could speed
> that up with tighter threshold pruning of the phrase table.
>
> See the script scripts/training/threshold-filter.perl or the setting
> score-settings = "--MinScore 2:0.0001"
> in EMS.
>
> -phi
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Vincent Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are some results with several values with cube pruning pop limit :
>>
>> (pop limit / decoding time for 3000 sentences / BLEU score)
>>
>> 5000 - 15m45 - 29.59
>> 1000 - 4m27 - 29.59
>> 500 - 3m35 - 29.59
>> 200 - 3m15 - 29.51
>> 100 - 3m00 - 29.40
>>
>> Therefore I took 400 - 3m19 - 29.58
>>
>> If I am not mistaken the default value for Moses is 1000 [read in the
>> doc] but in the EMS
>> it is 5000 right now .... which makes the experience so long .....
>> I suggest to change the EMS default value.
>>
>> Is there a way to also use a cube pruning limit in the decoder at Tuning
>> time ?
>>
>> Now with this optimized setting I get a ration of 15 segments per second
>> in average.
>> What is the reason for online tools like Google / Bing to be much much
>> faster.
>> it's not a machine issue, is it ?
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Vincent
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moses-support mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to