Guys,

While running EMS with a big test file I realized that the analysis.perl 
was executed very quickly while the actual Nist-Bleu was much much longer.

Also one thing is that the file "BLEU-Annotation" generated during 
analysis does not contain the right line numbering.
it takes 0 as the first line thus, all line number are offset by 1.

Last, when you "average" the BLEU score from all these lines, it is not 
the actual Nist BLEU score reported, slightly different.

Is it computed differently ?

Thanks,

Vincent
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to