I did similar comparisons back in the pre-1.0 days and the multithread
approach came out much better -- quite close to multi-process.  I
believed (and continue to believe) that it is because of the change
from a large global cache to small per-thread caches.

I expect that memory consumption will limit scalability in a lot of
important cases.

> It make me seriously wonder whether we should use abandon
> multi-threading and go all out for the multi-process approach.

> What do people think?
_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to