Dou you have an URL or repo for that?

W dniu 26.11.2017 o 14:58, Ondrej Bojar pisze:
> I can really recommend Eman to people interested in spawning dozens of 
> similar experiments, by deriving new variations from older ones. Eman will 
> take care of reusing reusable bits and creating new bits as needed. So e.g. 
> corpus preprocessing, bpe etc. could be reused when you want to try new 
> training parameters.
>
> The main reason for my little hesitation is that there has been no cleanup 
> and release of Eman and friends for quite a while. We are actively using it, 
> but such a polish would be better before trying to get fresh publicity.
>
> Please have a look at the old eman PBML paper and if you think this would 
> match the intended use for your aimed user group, it would make a great 
> incentive for us to do this cleanup.
>
> Thanks, O.
>
>
> 26. listopadu 2017 14:31:40 SEČ, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt <[email protected]> 
> napsal:
>> Hi Ondrej,
>> you do not seem confident enough to recommend Eman :)
>>
>> I now took another look at duct tape. That does not look too bad,
>> basically Make with multi-targets and easier reuse of existing recipes
>> (which is a nightmare in GNU make).
>> Is anyone still using duct tape, commit dates are from two years ago?
>>
>> W dniu 26.11.2017 o 13:30, Ondrej Bojar pisze:
>>> Hi, Marcin.
>>>
>>> I am afraid you are correct. I have my Eman and a couple of my
>> students are using it (we have Neural Monkey, Nematus, t2t and probably
>> already also Marian in), but it has a rather steep learning curve and
>> it generally has other bells and whistles that what someone with data
>> and desire for a single model would ask for.
>>> There were also Makefiles for Moses, but I never tried those.
>>>
>>> And Neural Monkey has most of the pre-processing and evaluation in
>> itself.
>>> I guess that commented oneliner snippets are the best thing you can
>> do.
>>> Cheers, O.
>>>
>>>
>>> 26. listopadu 2017 10:41:16 SEČ, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt
>> <[email protected]> napsal:
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> I am preparing a couple of usage example for my NMT toolkit and got
>>>> hung
>>>> up on all the preprocessing and other evil stuff. I am wondering is
>>>> there now anything decent around for doing preprocessing, running
>>>> experiments and evaluation? Or is the best thing still GNU make
>> (isn't
>>>> that embarrassing)?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Marcin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moses-support mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
>


_______________________________________________
Moses-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support

Reply via email to