Hi Anders, Apologies for the debian/changelog bugs, and thanks for fixing them. I should have tested that with package builds before pushing to GitHub. I tried to fix it on Friday, but got hung up on how to represent "1.3.0-rc2" as a Debian version, and ran out of time. I think I understand your change, but let me ask, since Debian package versioning looks a bit like a black art from here:
* Does Debian packaging versioning depend solely on the Debian version number, or is any info extracted from or checked against the upstream's version? Obviously, they *should* be correlated, for ease of use and proper sorting, but I'm trying to understand how a Debian version number may differ from the upstream's. * Is the version naming in Mosh sensible and logical from a Debian point of view? I did assume that semantic versioning would fit OK with the Debian worldview, but I didn't actually check that. And does anybody involved with other packaging systems want to comment? regards, --jh _______________________________________________ mosh-devel mailing list mosh-devel@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-devel
