Hi Vincent and Mark, Thanks for your feedback, it was very helpful. I will look into an SSH intermediary (mosh-client > mosh-server > ssh > endpoint) as a solution.
My primary motivation is the lag-friendly mosh interface, rather than the connection per se, which makes me wonder if both the mosh client and server could be on my local machine, which itself makes the tunneled/ProxyCommand ssh connection with a regular tunnel or similar. The connection benefits are obviously lost, but I suspect even the lag-friendly interface would be rendered useless. An experiment for another day. I have summarized your helpful responses as an answer to my SU question. Thanks again! David On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent-m...@vinc17.net> wrote: > On 2014-03-28 17:08:00 +0200, David Seaward wrote: >> Ah, this is more complicated than I thought :D >> >> I thought it was going to be one of: >> >> a) mosh-client - ssh - ssh - mosh-server >> >> ...where "ssh - ssh" may be some kind of transparent hop, or >> >> b) mosh-client - mosh-? - mosh-? - mosh-server >> >> ...with funky configuration on the hops. > > With stone (or similar UDP repeater), if I understand correctly, > I was thinking of: > > mosh-client - stone - mosh-server > > or > > mosh-client - stone - stone - mosh-server > > for 2 gateways. > > -- > Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> > 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> > Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) > _______________________________________________ > mosh-users mailing list > mosh-users@mit.edu > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-users _______________________________________________ mosh-users mailing list mosh-users@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-users
