Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
        motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
        motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: How to decrease CPU usage ? (Colin Law)
   2. Re: How to decrease CPU usage ? (Richard Bown)
   3. Multiple cams & cpu usage (Richard Bown)
   4. Re: Multiple cams & cpu usage (tosiara)
   5. Re: Multiple cams & cpu usage (Richard Bown)
   6. Re: Multiple cams & cpu usage (tosiara)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:38:04 +0000
From: Colin Law <clan...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] How to decrease CPU usage ?
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
        <CAL=0gLvpi6TMgKuPUNC360oc9d+ATanuvQ3yZXcO=YvCAh=s...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 17 January 2016 at 10:21, Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com> wrote:
> [snip]
> What I would like is to find a way of only recording events that take more 
> than say 5 secs,
> I get loads of .avi files that are 20-30 KB that show nothing, where there is 
> real movement
> captured they are always longer than 50KB in length.
> Its events like the low winter sun shining thru a tree and the branches 
> moving in the wind.
> A spider filter would be a big advantage , they are a ****** PITA

It is best to start a new thread to ask a different question rather
than hijacking the OP's thread.

Colin



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:15:41 +0000
From: Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] How to decrease CPU usage ?
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20160117141541.0d815f0c.rich...@g8jvm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:38:04 +0000
Colin Law <clan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 17 January 2016 at 10:21, Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > What I would like is to find a way of only recording events that take more 
> > than say 5 secs,
> > I get loads of .avi files that are 20-30 KB that show nothing, where there 
> > is real movement
> > captured they are always longer than 50KB in length.
> > Its events like the low winter sun shining thru a tree and the branches 
> > moving in the wind.
> > A spider filter would be a big advantage , they are a ****** PITA
> 
> It is best to start a new thread to ask a different question rather
> than hijacking the OP's thread.
> 
> Colin
> 
> --

Sorry :(

-- 
-- 
Best wishes /73 
Richard Bown

Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
nil carborundum a illegitemis
##################################################################################
Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W & 3cms 5W
Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
##################################################################################
 




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:54:04 +0000
From: Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com>
Subject: [Motion-user] Multiple cams & cpu usage
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20160119145404.0764f9b2.rich...@g8jvm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII


Hi

Which is going to have to use less cpu/memory usage ???
using one instance of motion with multiple cameras
multiple instances of motion with one cam/motion
The later is easier to configure, I have three cams , two web IP and one USB cam
But it will be using a ARM SBC, twice the speed of a Rasp PI2, the same SBC is 
also used 
as streaming media device, So far no problems with one instance of motion when 
Kodi is run.
TIA
-- 
-- 
Best wishes /73 
Richard Bown

Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
nil carborundum a illegitemis
##################################################################################
Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W & 3cms 5W
Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
##################################################################################
 




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:03:29 +0200
From: tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Multiple cams & cpu usage
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
        <cachtdwrvjn51y0rm2h-oaandyywye+f0liekxmsqmd9kvwq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I use separate motion process per camera. Mostly because of a bug when
threaded config can cause picture corruptions (pictures partialy mixed)
I don't thing there will be any significant performance or memory penalty
if you are using threaded or not threaded scenario. It's only about
maintaining config files

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com> wrote:

>
> Hi
>
> Which is going to have to use less cpu/memory usage ???
> using one instance of motion with multiple cameras
> multiple instances of motion with one cam/motion
> The later is easier to configure, I have three cams , two web IP and one
> USB cam
> But it will be using a ARM SBC, twice the speed of a Rasp PI2, the same
> SBC is also used
> as streaming media device, So far no problems with one instance of motion
> when Kodi is run.
> TIA
> --
> --
> Best wishes /73
> Richard Bown
>
> Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
> HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
> nil carborundum a illegitemis
>
> ##################################################################################
> Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W &
> 3cms 5W
> Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
> QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
> OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
>
> ##################################################################################
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:01:58 +0000
From: Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Multiple cams & cpu usage
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <20160119170158.1ba3d25e.rich...@g8jvm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Many thanks
Am I correct with multiple instances of motion you copy the motion binary to 
motion1, motion2, ect
and the conf files for each motion1.conf  motion2.conf



On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:03:29 +0200
tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I use separate motion process per camera. Mostly because of a bug when
> threaded config can cause picture corruptions (pictures partialy mixed)
> I don't thing there will be any significant performance or memory penalty
> if you are using threaded or not threaded scenario. It's only about
> maintaining config files
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Which is going to have to use less cpu/memory usage ???
> > using one instance of motion with multiple cameras
> > multiple instances of motion with one cam/motion
> > The later is easier to configure, I have three cams , two web IP and one
> > USB cam
> > But it will be using a ARM SBC, twice the speed of a Rasp PI2, the same
> > SBC is also used
> > as streaming media device, So far no problems with one instance of motion
> > when Kodi is run.
> > TIA
> > --
> > --
> > Best wishes /73
> > Richard Bown
> >
> > Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
> > HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
> > nil carborundum a illegitemis
> >
> > ##################################################################################
> > Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W &
> > 3cms 5W
> > Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
> > QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
> > OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
> >
> > ##################################################################################
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > _______________________________________________
> > Motion-user mailing list
> > Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> > http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
> >



-- 
-- 
Best wishes /73 
Richard Bown

Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
nil carborundum a illegitemis
##################################################################################
Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W & 3cms 5W
Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
##################################################################################
 




------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:12:50 +0200
From: tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Multiple cams & cpu usage
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID:
        <CACHTdwQwq=w=Wa7f2OE-1Ck8QghmqX=rm+K5=apdkwm4t87...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Not necessary. I simply run the same binary with different config on the
command line

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com> wrote:

> Many thanks
> Am I correct with multiple instances of motion you copy the motion binary
> to motion1, motion2, ect
> and the conf files for each motion1.conf  motion2.conf
>
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:03:29 +0200
> tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I use separate motion process per camera. Mostly because of a bug when
> > threaded config can cause picture corruptions (pictures partialy mixed)
> > I don't thing there will be any significant performance or memory penalty
> > if you are using threaded or not threaded scenario. It's only about
> > maintaining config files
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Richard Bown <rich...@g8jvm.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Which is going to have to use less cpu/memory usage ???
> > > using one instance of motion with multiple cameras
> > > multiple instances of motion with one cam/motion
> > > The later is easier to configure, I have three cams , two web IP and
> one
> > > USB cam
> > > But it will be using a ARM SBC, twice the speed of a Rasp PI2, the same
> > > SBC is also used
> > > as streaming media device, So far no problems with one instance of
> motion
> > > when Kodi is run.
> > > TIA
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Best wishes /73
> > > Richard Bown
> > >
> > > Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
> > > HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
> > > nil carborundum a illegitemis
> > >
> > >
> ##################################################################################
> > > Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W
> &
> > > 3cms 5W
> > > Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
> > > QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
> > > OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
> > >
> > >
> ##################################################################################
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Motion-user mailing list
> > > Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> > > http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Best wishes /73
> Richard Bown
>
> Email : rich...@g8jvm.com
> HTTP  :  http://www.g8jvm.com
> nil carborundum a illegitemis
>
> ##################################################################################
> Ham Call: G8JVM . QRV: 50-432 MHz + Microwave 23 cms 140W, 13 cms 100W &
> 3cms 5W
> Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38, LAT. 52 39.720' N LONG. 2 28.171 W
> QRV VHF 6mtrs 200W, 4 mtrs 150W, 2mtrs 400W, 70cms 200W
> OS: Linux Mint 17.3 x86_64 on a Dell Inspiron N5030 laptop
>
> ##################################################################################
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user


End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 116, Issue 5
*******************************************

Reply via email to