Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
        motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
        motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. any chance for image preprocessing? (Jens Rapp)
   2. Re: any chance for image preprocessing? (Colin Law)
   3. Re: any chance for image preprocessing? (Jens Rapp)
   4. Re: any chance for image preprocessing? (Colin Law)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:43:08 +0200
From: Jens Rapp <rapp.j...@googlemail.com>
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Motion-user] any chance for image preprocessing?
Message-ID: <85203ea9-ecea-f0bc-aab3-ac5c81a38...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi,

i'm gonna use motion for streaming webcam images with a very large view 
angle, so what I get has a big fisheye effect. Is there any chance to do 
some preprocessing for the taken images to correct those things?




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:58:51 +0100
From: Colin Law <clan...@gmail.com>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] any chance for image preprocessing?
Message-ID:
        <CAL=0glvmgjh7dk1cdg6an+ath_1xdmdxzwswae3xf+d+agj...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On 17 October 2017 at 18:43, Jens Rapp via Motion-user
<motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm gonna use motion for streaming webcam images with a very large view
> angle, so what I get has a big fisheye effect. Is there any chance to do
> some preprocessing for the taken images to correct those things?

Might it be be better to do post processing rather than pre. Then you
you would not be wasting processor time adusting images that were just
chucked away as there was no motion.

Colin



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:01:53 +0200
From: Jens Rapp <rapp.j...@googlemail.com>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] any chance for image preprocessing?
Message-ID:
        <caljxx7xy+jrzejbujeyl8dehpdtvotzw2xqbhzqx2fmy8po...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Well, the result will be directly streamed to a web based application so
there is not really a chance to do post processing.

Am 17.10.2017 9:59 nachm. schrieb "Colin Law" <clan...@gmail.com>:

> On 17 October 2017 at 18:43, Jens Rapp via Motion-user
> <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i'm gonna use motion for streaming webcam images with a very large view
> > angle, so what I get has a big fisheye effect. Is there any chance to do
> > some preprocessing for the taken images to correct those things?
>
> Might it be be better to do post processing rather than pre. Then you
> you would not be wasting processor time adusting images that were just
> chucked away as there was no motion.
>
> Colin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 21:10:22 +0100
From: Colin Law <clan...@gmail.com>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] any chance for image preprocessing?
Message-ID:
        <CAL=0gluy99iwo8oquypb2u7csj6e7gxjjugf_ap1awmnxsj...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On 17 October 2017 at 21:01, Jens Rapp via Motion-user
<motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Well, the result will be directly streamed to a web based application so
> there is not really a chance to do post processing.

Do you mean it is streamed even when there is no motion? If so then
there is likely no difference between processing on the way into
motion or on the way out.  Either way it is not really a motion
question I don't think. You have a stream coming in, either from a
camera or out of motion, and you want to process it to remove the
distortion. You can either do that by processing the stream out of the
camera and feeding it to motion, or on the way out of motion before
you send it to the web server.

Colin

Colin

>
> Am 17.10.2017 9:59 nachm. schrieb "Colin Law" <clan...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> On 17 October 2017 at 18:43, Jens Rapp via Motion-user
>> <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > i'm gonna use motion for streaming webcam images with a very large view
>> > angle, so what I get has a big fisheye effect. Is there any chance to do
>> > some preprocessing for the taken images to correct those things?
>>
>> Might it be be better to do post processing rather than pre. Then you
>> you would not be wasting processor time adusting images that were just
>> chucked away as there was no motion.
>>
>> Colin
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Motion-user mailing list
>> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user



------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user


------------------------------

End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 136, Issue 3
*******************************************

Reply via email to