Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the latest version
does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but it
does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie
armhf version? (#947) (Dave Howorth)
2. Re: [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the latest version
does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but it
does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie
armhf version? (#947) (tosiara)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 20:17:40 +0100
From: Dave Howorth <d...@howorth.org.uk>
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb
version but it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a
jessie armhf version? (#947)
Message-ID: <20190601201740.09022...@acer-suse.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 17:15:45 +0000
"John D. Gwinner" <j...@gwinner.org> wrote:
> The bug I was talking about you already commented on.
>
> Thank you for checking that, I appreciate it.
>
> I replied back to the original bug.
>
> Please post the output of .configure and check the database to see if
> the records actually get there.
Generally, if a maintainer of a project, such as tosiara, claims to
have built something and it works then I would give them the benefit of
the doubt. Thus I would feel the onus is on you, not them, to do
further testing if you wish to disprove it.
> If they do, then we need to update the build instructions for
> Raspbian.
Could well be.
> The log output isn?t proof, check to see if the records are actually
> there. I got similar results although I can?t remember the exact log
> file output and those Pi?s are now in the field.
As above, but since you haven't presumably tried the compatibility
library, it's difficult to see why you would expect the same results?
> There was a comment that help was needed with Autotools. Now suddenly
> POOF it works? Seems weird.
The comment about autotools was from somebody different and somewhat
orthogonal to this discussion, so I'm not sure it's relevant?
> I did start with a fresh install, on actual hardware, not an
> emulator. Not only that, I did it four times. Once with MariaDB, once
> with MySQL, then once with MySQL downloaded directly from Oracle, as
> apt-get actually installs a blend of Maria and MySQL. Then on Ubuntu,
> to do the merge.
>
> From looking at the output of the .h files that configure produced,
> it was pretty clear it would never work as SQL support was
> detected/set to ?no?. On all three builds; so I?m intrigued as to
> what is now suddenly different.
>
> == John ==
JMHO, Dave
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 22:57:28 +0300
From: tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb
version but it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a
jessie armhf version? (#947)
Message-ID:
<CACHTdwT6r6tDEak45RCf4p1=Ygj9iDmv0hJVtOjk3rYk=0=s...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
All my queries were successfully executed, I see records in my test table
Will attach the configure output to the ticket in github as mail list does
not allow me send it out
I used latest 2019-04-08-raspbian-stretch-lite.zip for my test
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 8:16 PM John D. Gwinner <j...@gwinner.org> wrote:
> The bug I was talking about you already commented on.
>
>
>
> Thank you for checking that, I appreciate it.
>
>
>
> I replied back to the original bug.
>
>
>
> Please post the output of .configure and check the database to see if the
> records actually get there.
>
>
>
> If they do, then we need to update the build instructions for Raspbian.
>
>
>
> The log output isn?t proof, check to see if the records are actually
> there. I got similar results although I can?t remember the exact log file
> output and those Pi?s are now in the field.
>
>
>
> There was a comment that help was needed with Autotools. Now suddenly POOF
> it works? Seems weird.
>
>
>
> I did start with a fresh install, on actual hardware, not an emulator. Not
> only that, I did it four times. Once with MariaDB, once with MySQL, then
> once with MySQL downloaded directly from Oracle, as apt-get actually
> installs a blend of Maria and MySQL. Then on Ubuntu, to do the merge.
>
>
>
> From looking at the output of the .h files that configure produced, it was
> pretty clear it would never work as SQL support was detected/set to ?no?.
> On all three builds; so I?m intrigued as to what is now suddenly different.
>
>
>
> == John ==
>
>
>
> *From:* tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 1, 2019 4:10 AM
> *To:* Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
> latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but
> it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie armhf
> version? (#947)
>
>
>
> Sorry, I don't know what bug are you talking about
>
> I have Raspbian running in an emulator where everything compiles and works
> fine. You can see my proof of a working system in your original bug report:
> https://github.com/Motion-Project/motion/issues/875#issuecomment-497935264
>
> If you have any issues please try to start from a fresh install and save
> all your steps and logs so we can assist you.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 1:39 PM John D. Gwinner <j...@gwinner.org> wrote:
>
> Raspbian Stretch
>
>
>
> It compiles fine, it just will never include MySQL support.
>
>
>
> NO version of Raspbian will ever work, of course.
>
>
>
> Did you check the bug? I thought I had all the details in there??
>
>
>
> == John ==
>
>
>
> *From:* tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2019 11:59 PM
> *To:* Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
> latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but
> it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie armhf
> version? (#947)
>
>
>
> Which exact OS version fails to compile motion on Pi?
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:23 PM John D. Gwinner <j...@gwinner.org> wrote:
>
> Let me be more clear. MySQL on the Pi did not work either.
>
>
>
> Database support is just not compiled in. This is why the apt-get package,
> precompiled motion, won?t write to the database either. You HAVE to compile
> it from source, then it turns out that the configure step won?t configure
> it for database support no matter what DB you have installed.
>
>
>
> I rebuilt several Pi?s to debug this problem, including downloading the
> MySQL binaries directly from Oracle, and Motion still did not compile in
> database support.
>
>
>
> Please check the bug, it gives more details.
>
>
>
> I don?t personally think of database support on the Pi as an
> ?enhancement?.
>
>
>
> == John ==
>
>
>
> *From:* MrDave <motionmrd...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2019 12:21 AM
> *To:* motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
> latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but
> it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie armhf
> version? (#947)
>
>
>
> That last statement is not correct. Motion supports MySQL and adding
> MariaDB is an enhancement. They are different packages/software. I'll
> defer comments on that particular issue in github until a later time.
>
>
>
> On 5/30/2019 12:36 PM, John D. Gwinner wrote:
>
> I already did that. The net result was ?we don?t know Autotools Raspbian?
> and I don?t think anything ever got fixed. There was a call for people that
> knew Linux and autotools.
>
>
>
> https://github.com/Motion-Project/motion/issues/875
>
>
>
> It?s listed as an enhancement, which isn?t really correct. Basically,
> database access on a Raspberry Pi doesn?t work at all unless you do the
> workaround I mentioned in the bug (Install Ubuntu, install MySQL, run
> configure, copy over the appropriate configure lines and merge into a
> Raspbian configure script).
>
>
>
> The reason I commented on this thread was the response was ?you can build
> it yourself? which is absolutely correct for older O/S?s, (you can?t really
> maintain older stuff), but my point was that you CANNOT build it yourself
> due to this problem.
>
>
>
> == John ==
>
>
>
> *From:* tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com> <tosi...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 30, 2019 5:31 AM
> *To:* Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
> latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but
> it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie armhf
> version? (#947)
>
>
>
> For build issues please start a separate thread and provide logs and which
> exact error you were getting
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:12 AM John D. Gwinner <j...@gwinner.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, but I think I reported this before, Motion doesn?t build properly on
> Raspian.
>
>
>
> The database option wasn?t available until I did a custom build on Ubuntu,
> then copied the config files over.
>
>
>
> Database access seems to work, but the calls all fail.
>
>
>
> Is this fixed? If so, sorry to hijack the thread!
>
>
>
> I haven?t checked movie passthrough. I know without the Ubuntu
> config->Raspbian build, database access won?t work. You can compare the .h
> files and see the differences.
>
>
>
> == John ==
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image003.jpg@01D408D0.306E9400]
> <https://www.amazon.com/Getting-Started-React-VR-immersive-ebook/dp/B077VR6FMQ/>
>
> *John Gwinner* .
> *M* 310-227-9140
> cto4you.com
>
>
> My book at Amazon
> <https://www.amazon.com/Getting-Started-React-VR-immersive-ebook/dp/B077VR6FMQ/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* MrDave <motionmrd...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 29, 2019 9:52 PM
> *To:* motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Motion-user] [Motion-Project/motion] It looks like the
> latest version does not have pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version but
> it does have a stretch version. Is it possible to have a jessie armhf
> version? (#947)
>
>
>
> To answer the specific question, the debs on the releases page are only
> produced for common distros that are not at EOL. Jessie was no longer
> listed as a option for download on the main Raspbian page so it did not get
> a deb built. If it is needed, users can build their own deb via the
> packaging scripts. Instructions are within the build guide and there are
> also the videos demonstrating the building, creating deb packages,
> upgrading, using, setting up, etc.
>
> https://motion-project.github.io/motion_build.html
>
> https://motion-project.github.io/motion_guide.html (Has the link on it to
> the videos)
>
>
>
> On 5/29/2019 6:47 AM, tosiara wrote:
>
> I have never used motion packaging, but you can try to build yourself:
> https://github.com/Motion-Project/motion-packaging
>
> Or maybe someone on the list have experience making motion package for
> Raspberry Pi
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:12 PM bkoblenz <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
>
> I tried to follow the link, but the service is unavailable. So maybe it is
> appropriate to hit reply all!
>
> Sorry for asking an inappropriate question on github.
>
> However, I am still interested in a 4.2.2 version of motion for a jessie
> installation of raspberry pi (that is already running 4.1.1).
> Is there a pi_jessie_motion_4.2.2-1_armhf.deb version that I can wget? Of
> some directions for upgrading jessie from 4..1.1 to 4.2.2?
>
> I am particularly interested in the new movie_passthrough feature.
>
> thanks
> -brian
>
>
> <
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 9:44 AM tosiara <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
>
> > Please use mail list for questions
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/motion/mailman/motion-user/?viewmonth=201902
> >
> > ?
> > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> > <
> https://github.com/Motion-Project/motion/issues/947?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADHHYLIGWPVWYC5K54RDBPLPXQFVBA5CNFSM4HONFMUKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODWKGFHI#issuecomment-496263837
> >,
> > or mute the thread
> > <
> https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADHHYLNTRHX7Q4PWNSW7G23PXQFVBANCNFSM4HONFMUA
> >
> > .
> >
>
> ?
> You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/Motion-Project/motion/issues/947?email_source=notifications&email_token=AA3PETLJ5WCYVLOBIUFR2Z3PXVRWZA5CNFSM4HONFMUKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODWMZZAI#issuecomment-496606337>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA3PETLJQI57CJZWWIV3623PXVRWZANCNFSM4HONFMUA>
> .
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Motion-user mailing list
>
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
>
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Motion-user mailing list
>
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
>
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2216 bytes
Desc: not available
------------------------------
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
------------------------------
End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 156, Issue 6
*******************************************
