Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Raspberry Pi camera - Setting AWB values via Motion.
(David Dingley)
2. Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (rmbusy)
3. Re: Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (Ruslan Matveev)
4. Re: Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (Ruslan Matveev)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:50:35 +0100
From: David Dingley <da...@dingleyd.plus.com>
To: Motion User List <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Motion-user] Raspberry Pi camera - Setting AWB values via
Motion.
Message-ID: <815676c6-dd40-408b-92da-d97e7b579...@dingleyd.plus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I can?t find anything in the documentation that specifically says this
parameter can be set, but deduce that it ought to be capable of setting via
mmalcam_control_params.
Can anyone confirm this is works from actual use?
I ask because the forthcoming firmware introduces an additional value of
?greyworld? that needs to be set if using a NOIR camera. If not set the default
?auto? value will produce odd results and interact badly with Auto Brightness
if that is set in Motion.
Thanks.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:33:13 -0700
From: rmbusy <rmbusy+mot...@gmail.com>
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID: <9b0ca70d-c364-0c92-4073-0a736ccfb...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I upgraded my system to the latest version of Linux, and at the same
time, upgraded Motion from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2.
I have 8 RTSP cameras set up, 5 cameras configured for snapshot mode at
1 frame per second (all 2MP), and 3 streaming at 5 frames per second (2
2MP, 1 1MP).? All of this is running on a quad core Rock64 w/ 4GB DRAM,
at the default CPU frequency (1.3GHz).
With 4.1.1, I was seeing around 150% CPU utilization (via top), and when
connecting to the web page, around 300% CPU utilization. Since the
Rock64 is a quad core ARM processor, max is 400%.
Now with 4.2.2 and the same camera configuration files (updated with new
option names), I'm seeing CPU utilization of 250%, and when connecting
to the web page, the numbers are maxed out, and the web page is
basically non-responsive.
Since I upgraded the underlying OS, I can't rule out that it's requiring
more CPU cycles for Motion to do the same thing, but that seems
unlikely.? Running top doesn't show anything else using CPU cycles
(other than top).
Can anyone confirm if 4.2.2 is using significantly more CPU cycles than
4.1.1?? If I can't find a way to reduce the usage, I may have to go back
to 4.1.1.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
--
Rob.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:35:44 +0300
From: Ruslan Matveev <matveev.rus...@gmail.com>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID:
<CABqvc7uRHfF0=fq+0sxbp_8xzsffg_7fky5hyaue6vvob9v...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Do you have passtrough on?
??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:33 rmbusy <rmbusy+mot...@gmail.com>:
> I upgraded my system to the latest version of Linux, and at the same
> time, upgraded Motion from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2.
>
> I have 8 RTSP cameras set up, 5 cameras configured for snapshot mode at
> 1 frame per second (all 2MP), and 3 streaming at 5 frames per second (2
> 2MP, 1 1MP). All of this is running on a quad core Rock64 w/ 4GB DRAM,
> at the default CPU frequency (1.3GHz).
>
> With 4.1.1, I was seeing around 150% CPU utilization (via top), and when
> connecting to the web page, around 300% CPU utilization. Since the
> Rock64 is a quad core ARM processor, max is 400%.
>
> Now with 4.2.2 and the same camera configuration files (updated with new
> option names), I'm seeing CPU utilization of 250%, and when connecting
> to the web page, the numbers are maxed out, and the web page is
> basically non-responsive.
>
> Since I upgraded the underlying OS, I can't rule out that it's requiring
> more CPU cycles for Motion to do the same thing, but that seems
> unlikely. Running top doesn't show anything else using CPU cycles
> (other than top).
>
> Can anyone confirm if 4.2.2 is using significantly more CPU cycles than
> 4.1.1? If I can't find a way to reduce the usage, I may have to go back
> to 4.1.1.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>
> --
> Rob.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:41:43 +0300
From: Ruslan Matveev <matveev.rus...@gmail.com>
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID:
<CABqvc7tPxoiaO=fr8c+r2h_w8jpmoir0smnff+ynpwuvwpq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Do you have passtrough on?
??, 18 ???. 2019 ?., 21:33 rmbusy <rmbusy+mot...@gmail.com>:
> I upgraded my system to the latest version of Linux, and at the same
> time, upgraded Motion from 4.1.1 to 4.2.2.
>
> I have 8 RTSP cameras set up, 5 cameras configured for snapshot mode at
> 1 frame per second (all 2MP), and 3 streaming at 5 frames per second (2
> 2MP, 1 1MP). All of this is running on a quad core Rock64 w/ 4GB DRAM,
> at the default CPU frequency (1.3GHz).
>
> With 4.1.1, I was seeing around 150% CPU utilization (via top), and when
> connecting to the web page, around 300% CPU utilization. Since the
> Rock64 is a quad core ARM processor, max is 400%.
>
> Now with 4.2.2 and the same camera configuration files (updated with new
> option names), I'm seeing CPU utilization of 250%, and when connecting
> to the web page, the numbers are maxed out, and the web page is
> basically non-responsive.
>
> Since I upgraded the underlying OS, I can't rule out that it's requiring
> more CPU cycles for Motion to do the same thing, but that seems
> unlikely. Running top doesn't show anything else using CPU cycles
> (other than top).
>
> Can anyone confirm if 4.2.2 is using significantly more CPU cycles than
> 4.1.1? If I can't find a way to reduce the usage, I may have to go back
> to 4.1.1.
>
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>
> --
> Rob.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
------------------------------
End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 157, Issue 19
********************************************
