Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
        motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
        motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Unable to launch web control and webstream since update
      (Alexandre Adam)
   2. Re: Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage (rmbusy)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:25:39 +0200
From: Alexandre Adam <rezza...@gmail.com>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Unable to launch web control and webstream
        since update
Message-ID:
        <CAK=w6KJS2152qh8K0+=f+r37ao-wgtfv59ft3nt2bpa6wao...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Dear all,

Sorry for the late reply.

disabling IPv6 and changing the port number did changed anything...

I din't try the last nodification suggested by M. Dave (manually edit the
initialization options for MHD in the code)
, but I will try.

thanks for any ideas...

regards

RezzA


On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 19:54, MrDave <motionmrd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> One additional thing to try.  Turn off /remove the option for IPV6
>
>
> On 5/27/2019 10:49 AM, tosiara wrote:
>
> Try to change ports to
>
> webcontrol_port 32108
> stream_port 32109
>
> and check, do you still get the same error?
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:46 PM Alexandre Adam <rezza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> @Tosiara,
>>
>> here it is attached
>> Not any "6789" that I saw.
>>
>> RezzA
>>
>> On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 14:49, tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Show us "netstat -atn". Maybe port 6789 is already used, for example, by
>>> another instance of motion
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 27, 2019, 12:37 Alexandre Adam <rezza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> After running Motion from a terminal (not as a deamon) and with root
>>>> user, the result is the same.
>>>>
>>>> The log level raised to 9 bring us this :
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>> [0:motion] [NTC] [STR] [May 27 11:21:39] webu_start_ctrl: Starting
>>>> webcontrol on port 6789
>>>> [0:motion] [DBG] [STR] [May 27 11:21:39] webu_mhd_features_basic: Basic
>>>> authentication: available
>>>> [0:motion] [DBG] [STR] [May 27 11:21:39] webu_mhd_features_digest:
>>>> Digest authentication: available
>>>> [0:motion] [DBG] [STR] [May 27 11:21:39] webu_mhd_features_ipv6: IPV6:
>>>> available
>>>> [0:motion] [NTC] [STR] [May 27 11:21:39] webu_mhd_features_tls:
>>>> SSL/TLS: disabled
>>>> [0:motion] [NTC] [STR] [May 27 11:21:39] webu_start_ctrl: Unable to
>>>> start MHD
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> *libmicrohttpd-ssl is a dependancy of motion (I saw that while trying
>>>> to remove it and install microlibhttpd withtout SSL, but I did not do it
>>>> finally).*
>>>>
>>>> *What did I missed ? I trie*d with "webcontrol_tls" and "stream_tls"
>>>> to "on" in the motion.conf file. same results.
>>>>
>>>> best regards
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Motion-user mailing list
>>>> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>>>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>>>
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Motion-user mailing list
>>> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Motion-user mailing list
>> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>> https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing 
> listMotion-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-userhttps://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:43:31 -0700
From: rmbusy <rmbusy+mot...@gmail.com>
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion 4.2.2 vs 4.1.1 CPU usage
Message-ID: <37210ddd-4aab-0c5b-d57b-5b36e3d44...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

As soon as I get 4.1.1 building and working at the lower CPU usage 
again, I'll compare.

Another observation, I'm seeing a lot more pictures output now than 
before.? Also a lot of duplicated pictures with different time stamps.? 
For example, I'll get the same picture stamped as 2 different pictures, 
one second apart.? Initially I thought this was only happening with the 
snapshot cameras, but recently I had 5 duplicated pics from one of the 
streaming cameras (spanned 3 seconds, 2 of which had 2 pics where frame 
number incremented).? I never saw this with 4.1.1.

I fixed all the config file entries listed in the log file that changed 
in 4.2.2, but perhaps there's one that needs updating, that wasn't logged?


--
Rob.


On 7/20/19 11:18 AM, tosiara wrote:
> Would be nice to see motion log from 4.1.1 and 4.2.2 first
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 9:11 PM rmbusy <rmbusy+mot...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:rmbusy%2bmot...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I heard you in the beginning Rusian, but I really want to
>     understand why I'm seeing the increased CPU usage before I simply
>     try reducing it by other means.? Believe me, your suggestion is on
>     my list. :-)
>
>
>     --
>     Rob.
>
>
>     On 7/20/19 10:30 AM, Ruslan Matveev wrote:
>>     Wow! Thats what I've been saying to topic starter from very
>>     beginning ))
>>
>>     ??, 20 ???. 2019 ?., 20:28 tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:tosi...@gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         Solution for most popular RSTP cameras is to use low-res
>>         secondary stream for motion detection, and main high-res
>>         stream for pass through
>>
>>         On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 7:55 PM oleg.chekalin via Motion-user
>>         <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi All,
>>
>>             Then if all is bad as is, could someone propose a
>>             solution, to avoid the high load impact to processor?
>>
>>             I mean seam no way for capturing rtsp without
>>             coding/decoding date?
>>
>>             Regards,
>>             Oleg
>>
>>
>>
>>             ?????????? ? MI MAX 2
>>             tosiara <tosi...@gmail.com <mailto:tosi...@gmail.com>> |
>>             ??: 20 ???. 2019 ?. 6:53 ?? | ?????????:
>>
>>                 I have tested RTSP H264 1280x960 20 fps running on
>>                 ARM ODROID C1.
>>                 Just running, without any recording it takes 130%
>>                 CPU. 4.1.1, 4.2.2, Ubuntu 16.04 and 18.04 - the
>>                 result was always the same. NEON optimizations
>>                 reduced to 125%, not much. Pretty all the time motion
>>                 was decoding H264. The decoding, as already
>>                 mentioned, is very CPU intensive
>>
>>                 On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 5:36 PM Colin Law
>>                 <clan...@gmail.com <mailto:clan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                     On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 15:24, John D. Gwinner
>>                     <j...@gwinner.org <mailto:j...@gwinner.org>> wrote:
>>
>>                         Ok, that helps me with my project ? we need
>>                         to get 15fps or 30fps; (it?s a medical project).
>>
>>                         If you?re getting 2-5 and that high a CPU
>>                         rate, clearly we?ll never get to 15.
>>
>>
>>                     It also depends dramatically on the format of the
>>                     data.? If it is mpjpeg for example then motion
>>                     need do very little to decode the image, if
>>                     however it is H264 then there is a vast amount of
>>                     work required just extracting the images from the
>>                     stream.? On my system running an H264 camera a
>>                     lot more processor time is spent decoding the
>>                     stream than is spent in motion detection.
>>
>>                     Colin
>>                     _______________________________________________
>>                     Motion-user mailing list
>>                     Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>                     <mailto:Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>                     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>>                     https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>>                     Unsubscribe:
>>                     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Motion-user mailing list
>>             Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>             <mailto:Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>             https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>>             https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>>             Unsubscribe:
>>             https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Motion-user mailing list
>>         Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>         <mailto:Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>>         https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>>         Unsubscribe:
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Motion-user mailing list
>>     Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net  
>> <mailto:Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>>     https://motion-project.github.io/
>>
>>     Unsubscribe:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Motion-user mailing list
>     Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
>     https://motion-project.github.io/
>
>     Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

------------------------------



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user


------------------------------

End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 157, Issue 37
********************************************

Reply via email to