Send Motion-user mailing list submissions to
motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
motion-user-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
motion-user-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Motion-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Image review utility (ptm5...@blackfoot.net)
2. Motion blockers (Rainer Dorsch)
3. Re: Motion blockers (ptm5...@blackfoot.net)
4. Replay scenes -- network_url file:// (Rainer Dorsch)
5. Debian repository with 4.3.0? (Mike Sims)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:06:44 -0700
From: ptm5...@blackfoot.net
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Image review utility
Message-ID: <be9bd743-748f-fd9a-dd7b-3f3f4280a...@blackfoot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Hi Mike
First, thanks for posting your program. It gave me some good ideas for
what I want to do for a similar project.
As I posted earlier, your program would not run for me. For anyone else
who runs into this situation, a solution is to comment out lines 82 and
83 for the first run through:
#with open(self.log_file, 'r') as filelist:
#??????????? self.data = json.load(filelist)
This will produce a properly formated self.log_file later in the
program; the lines can be uncommented after the first run. It doesn't
seem to make much difference either way.
Your program also seems to have a problem moving between directories.
That might be because some of my picture directories are empty. I
haven't had a chance to run that down yet.
There are other problems: moving between directories, deleting all files
crashes, "File -> Close" doesn't do anything. I haven't had a chance to
run these down yet.
Fun to work with Python again after 15+ years ...
Pete
On 2/22/20 12:29 PM, ptm5...@blackfoot.net wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> Was thinking of trying something like this for my motion setup, which
> I have working well.
>
> I downloaded your project, set the variables, and ran it.? Got stopped
> cold at 'open(self.log_file, 'r') as filelist: no such file. I created
> an empty file, but that doesn't help, as I get stopped later in the
> program when the file is parsed. Seems like it's expecting an already
> loaded file to start.
>
> I'm not a programmer; any skills I ever had are extremely rusty so if
> this is too stupid to even contemplate, that's ok. Otherwise, maybe
> some insight into what I'm not doing correctly?
>
> Thanks, Pete
>
> On Feb 20, 2020 8:43 AM, Mike Sherman <wheelwrightm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wrote a small python program to help me quickly review the
> captured motion images.
>
> I just published it on Github at
> https://github.com/mike-sherman/imagereview.py 3
> <https://github.com/mike-sherman/imagereview.py>
>
> The program reviews the images after they have been copied from
> the cloud down to the local computer and deletes unwanted images
> from the local computer. The cloud sync then deletes the images
> from the cloud.
>
> I don?t know if this would be useful for anyone else, but I?m
> putting it out there just in case it might be.
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Sherman? ? ---- wheelwrightm...@gmail.com
> <mailto:wheelwrightm...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:52:27 +0100
From: Rainer Dorsch <m...@bokomoko.de>
To: Motion discussion list <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Motion-user] Motion blockers
Message-ID: <3246069.L1TVYgkHFZ@nanette>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
I used zoneminder some time back, but due to the much better and more reliable
packaging for Debian I moved to motion.
One nice feature which was very useful for me in zoneminder to reduce false
motion positives, was to define a zone (mask in motion), which blocked motion
if changes have been visible there.
A typical example would be to block motion detection when e.g. sun
illumination changes:
- declare one or multiple zones at e.g. a wall at a height of e.g. 4 m, where
you would never expect motion
- if motion is detected there, then any detection in the areas to monitor is
likely to be a false alarm as well.
Are there any recommended options in motion to achieve something similar?
How do you handle changing sun or other illumination in motion?
Many thanks
Rainer
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:42:51 -0700
From: ptm5...@blackfoot.net
To: Rainer Dorsch via Motion-user <motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Motion-user] Motion blockers
Message-ID: <2beb7750-deea-3bbb-c89e-446c8bcee...@blackfoot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
In the Configuration file (general, or individual camera)
lightswitch_percent and lightswitch_frames have worked pretty well for me.
On 2/25/20 10:52 AM, Rainer Dorsch via Motion-user wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used zoneminder some time back, but due to the much better and more reliable
> packaging for Debian I moved to motion.
>
> One nice feature which was very useful for me in zoneminder to reduce false
> motion positives, was to define a zone (mask in motion), which blocked motion
> if changes have been visible there.
>
> A typical example would be to block motion detection when e.g. sun
> illumination changes:
> - declare one or multiple zones at e.g. a wall at a height of e.g. 4 m, where
> you would never expect motion
> - if motion is detected there, then any detection in the areas to monitor is
> likely to be a false alarm as well.
>
> Are there any recommended options in motion to achieve something similar?
>
> How do you handle changing sun or other illumination in motion?
>
> Many thanks
> Rainer
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Motion-user mailing list
> Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
> https://motion-project.github.io/
>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/motion-user
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:32:56 +0100
From: Rainer Dorsch <m...@bokomoko.de>
To: "motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
<motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Motion-user] Replay scenes -- network_url file://
Message-ID: <2835445.UNYbqiRt6H@nanette>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
in order to optimize parameters, I would be quite beneficial to be able to
replay some scenes or even just a few days of video material. I found the
file:// input of netcam_url, which looks very promising.
I thought that capturing the camera stream with ffmpeg is best to get a good
one-to-one correspondence of running on the file:// replay and running on the
camera stream rtsp:// itself.
I am struggling somewhat with the sentence
"Note that since the file may have been created using a different framerate
than
specified in the Motion config file, the file may be processed at either a
faster
or slower rate than real time."
Does "processed" mean just CPU utilization or does it mean that the replay
will not work properly on time based options (e.g. event_gap) or even worse on
frame based options?
Thanks
Rainer
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:45:50 -0800
From: Mike Sims <sims.m...@gmail.com>
To: motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Motion-user] Debian repository with 4.3.0?
Message-ID:
<CAMVmR8bVZ6e9Y3ysjcyp1CKHoQkdtL5+kQ=U=o-mqp2xkyz...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Does anyone know if there is a Debian repository that I can add to my apt
settings so that I can update to 4.3.0 using the apt-get method? Current
default repositories only have 4.1.1
Thank you,
Mike Sims
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
------------------------------
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Motion-user mailing list
Motion-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/motion-user
------------------------------
End of Motion-user Digest, Vol 164, Issue 36
********************************************
