The divisiveness between factions of MOU is a terrible weakness in Minnesota 
birding.  In some ways we have the most progressive birding atmosphere of just 
about any state, with a lot of space in prominent, large newspapers devoted to 
birds, regular radio and TV coverage about birds and birding issues, and an 
unusually informed citizenry.  The fact that MOU is losing members in a state 
with so much genuine interest in birds is a telling one.  Right now there is so 
much infighting, arrogance, factionalizing, and poisonous competitiveness 
within the Minnesota birding community--exemplified by the fact that we can't 
even function civilly with a single listserve for the state--and so much 
resistance to letting any but a fairly small group of individuals become part 
of some important "inner circles," that the birding atmosphere sometimes seems 
genuinely infected.  

I believe Jim Williams has identified some of the serious problems, and think 
he had some reasonable approaches to them.  I'd quibble with him regarding 
vetting state records--one critical function of a state ornithological society 
such as MOU is to create and maintain a truly scientific and authoritative 
checklist, and although over the years I've had my share of MORC rejections, 
I've never felt that they've done anything less than a professional and fair 
job at this thankless task.  But healthy debate to tease out the best 
resolutions to such issues is important, and that simply does not take place 
when a Board of Directors has no regular turnover and when members aren't given 
some say in who runs their organization and where it is heading.  

There will be some people who breathe a sigh of relief that Jim is resigning, 
so they don't need to listen to his warnings and suggestions anymore. They'll 
be like the bus driver who KNOWS it's his turn to go at an intersection, and 
even though the oncoming truck is clearly not going to stop, refuses to change 
his course, taking his passengers down with him, but dying with a smug, 
self-righteous smile.

Laura Erickson
Duluth, MN

Journey North Science Writer
<http://learner.org/jnorth/current.html>

Producer, "For the Birds" radio program
<http://www.lauraerickson.com/>

There is symbolic as well as actual beauty in the migration of birds.  There is 
something infinitely healing in the repeated refrains of nature--the assurance 
that dawn comes after night, and spring after the winter.

                                --Rachel Carson 


Reply via email to