I strongly suggest the birding community follow any developments in the 
shooting. In the 90's a friend of mine witnessed a GGOW shooting on the upper 
penninsula of MI. He followed through and had the man brought to court. I can't 
remember the details exactly, but it happened in this general manner. The jury 
was taking a few hours to deliberate. The judge called the jury out and said 
something to the extent of, "this is ridiculous, this is over a bird, I want a 
decision." In spite of the fact that there was an eye witness to the shooting 
of a federally protected bird, the man responsible was found not guilty. The 
judge's attitude towards the case seems to have had a strong impact on the 
verdict.
    This is an account of the story I was told first hand from my friend who 
witnessed the shooting and took the man to court. I'm not saying this would 
happen again, but we can't take for granted that if the shooter is brought to 
court, justice will be served.
    Chris Neri

Reply via email to