There was a lot more substance to Sparky's analysis than the undeserved
characterization of "ends justifying the means".
-- 
Bernard P. Friel
Web Pages - http://www.wampy.com  ;
            http://www.wampy.com/bn   Owl Gallery
            http://www.wampy.com/bn2  Songbirds
            http://www.wampy.com/GalapagosGallery

            http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=1113
         
            


> From: John Anderson <[email protected]>
> Organization: John Anderson
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:40:04 -0600
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [mou-net] No Baiting
> 
> I read Sparky's email and I do not agree with his position.   I am a
> wildlife photographer as a pastime.  So granted, it is not how I make a
> living.  I would love to get the spectacular shots that some photographers
> get by baiting, but it crosses a line that I believe is unacceptable.
> 
> Sometimes in my enthusiasm I will get too close to a bird and it will flush.
> At least in this situation the bird learns to stay away from humans.
> Biting birds alters the equation in the other direction.   It creates a
> dynamic which is not natural.
> 
> Sparky points out the good things that come from his efforts.  This is the
> classic "ends justifying the means" argument.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> John A. Anderson
> Minneapolis
> 
> ----
> Join or Leave mou-net:http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
> Archives:http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

----
Join or Leave mou-net:http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives:http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to