The differences in Juvenile Pomerine and Parasitic Jaegers can be difficult to 
discern but I believe that if you are looking at a fairly close photo of the 
two you should be able to make the proper identification. While I was at 
Wisconsin Point there was debate about the juvenile birds that we were looking 
at. I later took a look at the photos that another birder was kind enough to 
send to me and found that we had seen all three species. The consensus that 
morning was that we were seeing the adult Long-tailed Jaeger and the juvenile 
Pomerine over and over but I had my doubts about this and photos confirmed my 
doubts. I studied the Peterson Advanced birding guide and many photos taken 
from coastal pelagic trips along with photos from fellow Minnesota birders. 
Here is what I found:
One aspect that seems to be little talked about between the two is the head 
size. The Pomarine has a noticeably larger head that bulges out past the wings 
and I think this can be one of the better characteristics. In direct comparison 
this can be quite noticeable and the most recent posted photos of the Parasitic 
show this quite well (it has a relatively small head).
Pomarines have a much more noticeable bi-colored bill than a Parasitic although 
both can show this characteristic. Even in poor light the Pomarines bill should 
typically show bi-colored when a Parasitic's bill may appear black. 
The barring on the Pomarine is more distinct. There is barring on the Parasitic 
but it is more even throughout the underwing and far less contrasting on the 
undertail coverts. The Pomarine typically has an almost black and white 
contrast where the Parasitic will have a more light brown to cinnamon and black 
contrast. 
The Parasitic usually has more cinnamon coloring and the coloring is less 
contrasting and more uniform than the Pomarine. Both seem to have darker heads 
than bodies. Pomarines may have a dark brown coloration but it does not have 
the warm tone of the Parasitic.
Wing size can be subtle but the Pomarine has a chunkier wing more reminiscent 
of a skua and I find that the white wing patch is slightly more elongated on 
the Parasitic (this would be hard to analyze unless there was a direct photo 
comparison).
Unfortunately since I did not know which was the Pomarine and which was the 
Parasitic when I was actually looking at the birds I can not comment on flight 
style. All of the juvenile birds to me looked to be about the size of an adult 
Ring-billed Gull or slightly smaller (I had fantastic side by side views of 
this on multiple occasions).
One aspect that I think can sometimes be misleading is the tail extension. On 
an obvious individual the sharper tail extension can be very useful for the 
Parasitic but I found that in many photos it was difficult to tell if there was 
a small rounded extension or a slightly longer pointed extension. Because of 
this I found that if the bird has a short tail extension the photo needs to be 
extremely close and at the correct angle to make the distinction between the 
two and could lead a person in the wrong direction if this is used for 
identification without looking at all other characteristics.
Another photo that to me looks like a Parasitic and not a Pomarine is the 
juvenile bird that Erik Bruhnke posted on 10/15/10. The bottom photo I believe 
to be a Parasitic based on the above observations but this analysis could be 
wrong.
I do not pretend to be an expert on the above species and these are just 
personal observations. As with any of the more difficult species it is best to 
look at a combination of characteristics.
Just the fact that that we are able to analyze all three species in detail is a 
great experience and shows how fun and challenging birding can be!
Any comments are appreciated.
 
Thanks,
Jason Caddy
South Minneapolis
[email protected]                                       
----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to