Really Guys? On Give to the Max Day? Ha :)

I would love it if everyone on MOU-Net, or in Minnesota for that matter, were 
M.O.U. members. However, MOU-Net is a free service provided to all who are 
interested in the Birds of Minnesota regardless of membership status. Everyone 
is welcome.

Likewise, everyone is encouraged to share their sightings but no one is 
required to. The fact that so many good birds show up on MOU-Net is a testament 
to all who do share. Thank You! There are many reasons users don't share 
ranging from concern for the well-being of the bird to privacy of the landowner 
to insecurity on the identification or they don't know how to post. That is for 
each user to decide for themselves, however, if you wish to post but are 
apprehensive about posting a bird over concern of the id, you just don't know 
how, or are unsure whether it is significant, email me and I would be glad to 
post it for you (or anonymously if you prefer).

A couple notes from the list-service guidelines 
(http://moumn.org/listservice.html)

Courtesy

... Of course, different people have different views as to what constitutes a 
"notable" bird sighting or an appropriate posting. Ultimately, you are the only 
person who can judge what is important to you and what may be to others, and 
your decision to post a sighting or other reasonable message here will be 
respected.

This is an open mailing list. Unless noted otherwise, messages are posted here 
by individuals, not by the MOU as an organization. No effort is made to review 
messages prior to their dissemination to subscribers. There is no guarantee of 
the accuracy of any message (including reports of rarities - note that some are 
never confirmed or documented).

Privacy

In order to protect the privacy and property rights of people who host rare or 
unusual birds, mou-net and mou-rba have adopted the following policy regarding 
the posting of addresses.

No private addresses are to be broadcast on mou-net or mou-rba without prior 
permission from the homeowner/landowner. If you include such an address, 
include the name of the person who received permission for such an 
announcement. If you "know" or assume permission has been granted but do not 
know who received this permission, do not post the address. 

If permission has been granted with conditions (e.g., only from 9AM - 4PM, only 
at most 5 people in the yard at one time, check in with homeowner before 
entering yard, etc.) include such conditions in your message. If you are the 
one to procure permission through direct conversation with the homeowner, be 
explicit with them as to what they can expect and ask them what conditions they 
would like to impose on birders. You might even volunteer some conditions, such 
as "not before 9 AM", since it may not occur to them that someone might be in 
their yard at 5AM looking for a bird.

Finally, do not assume that permission for birders to visit is the same as 
permission to post it to mou-net or mou-rba.



Carl Greiner
[email protected]



----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Holtz <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:07:21 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [mou-net] Responsible to share?

I have a related point. If people are going to use the list serve to keep up
with all the sightings posted, would it not be respectful and considerate to
spent the small membership fee and support the work of the MOU?

Bob Holtz

-----Original Message-----
From: Minnesota Birds [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Al
Schirmacher
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mou-net] Responsible to share?

Find myself a bit disturbed today with my MOU brethren.  Believe this topic
warrants a bit of polite, if diverging, discussion.

My position:  if one joins MOU, if one derives benefit from MOU-Net & other
reporting mechanisms, one should share one's sightings as well.

I can understand withholding sensitive sightings, if rare birds are in peril
of disturbance during nesting or roosting.

However, if the rare sighting is of a migrant, vagrant or otherwise not in
peril "good bird", it should be shared for the good of all.  Sharing should
be the default, rather than withholding.

Sharing benefits others in the birding community, whether one looks at such
from an educational, fellowship, mutual pleasure or variety of other
viewpoints.

Why hold back?  Why share too late for others?  Why share with only a few?
I admit, I do not understand.

Frankly I'd like to see a commitment to share be part of MOU membership
and/or subscribing to MOU.

Enough of my rant.  If you respond, publicly or back channel, please do so
with respect, and not naming others.  Please note that I'm sharing no
particulars.

Good birding to all.  Heading to the refuge, will share anything
worthwhile:)

Al Schirmacher
Princeton, MN

Sent from my iPhone
----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to