Hi Linda,

Good points. Thanks for taking the time to compose a thoughtful response. 

Mike Koutnik

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 3, 2016, at 8:47 AM, linda whyte <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I agree that the communication issue is complex; as noted, the birding 
> community is broad and diverse, though not strictly speaking, fragmented. 
> People have different reasons for birding, and time constraint may dictate 
> they narrow their choice of communication platform to those suited to their 
> particular purposes. 
> That said, I highly value having a central clearing-house that integrates 
> those different platforms. MOU has always seemed a logical choice, 
> appropriate for academic information, current sightings, and discussion of 
> issues. However, it must be a huge challenge for any one person to keep 
> current and integrate those other platforms with MOU. Subscribing to e-bird 
> alerts seems to  answer the need for "immediate" information... provided 
> everyone shares information in that venu.
> Some people may consciously choose to limit what, when, and where they post 
> particular information, such as owl locations. That's because birds can be 
> stressed by the attention of their human admirers, and not all birders seem 
> sensitive to that. If the delayed dispersal of such information prevents a 
> heavy, sudden influx of traffic, perhaps the far-flung web of our connections 
> is not a bad thing--it protects what we profess to love.
> Linda Whyte
> 
>> On Jan 2, 2016 10:51 PM, "Mike imap" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> With all due respect, saying "numerous" anything without specifics isn't 
>> helpful to those who aren't tuned into those channels. Can you be more 
>> specific?
>> 
>> This situation illustrates an opportunity to bridge amongst  generational 
>> technology  preferences to better serve the wider birding community.  Having 
>> just begun actively participating in the listserv-oriented community 
>> recently, it was already apparent to me that there is a broad and diverse 
>> but fragmented birding community. Enhancing connections between them would 
>> seem worthy of conversation.  Anyone else care to comment?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Mike Koutnik
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> > On Jan 2, 2016, at 10:31 PM, MOU admin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > (Posted by John Richardson <[email protected]> via moumn.org)
>> >
>> > Numerous local and national Facebook pages, and eBird I would say are the 
>> > two most used,
>> > but other are using blogging pages and other birding digest pages.
>> > ----
>> > Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
>> > Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html
>> 
>> ----
>> Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
>> Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

----
Join or Leave mou-net: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=mou-net
Archives: http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mou-net.html

Reply via email to