On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Alan Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bence, why does the process discourage people from organizing for their > purpose before they are approved? This part has always confused me. > Anyone can engage in activities that support the Wikimedia movement, why > would they be discouraged from organizing to execute activities for which > they require formal registration? Maybe the process should outline what > they get from this approval and make it clear that they are not permitted > to use those things until approval has been completed. I fear the chapters > committee may still be stepping over it's mandate to micromanage the > founding of organizations where its real role should be to ensure > organizations are compliant with the standards in order to get the rights > and benefits of approval. If I understand your concern and questions correctly (excuse me if I don't), the main reason that formal incorporation is discouraged before approval by Chapcom is because it is more difficult to make any changes – required either for compliance with the requirements or recommended simply as best practices – after formal incorporation than before. Organizing activities in itself, is actually encouraged. The main benefit of approval at this point is a long-term right to use the name "Wikimedia" (including in their name) and to get funding (e.g. through grants or the FDC);these benefits are granted fairly liberally on a short term basis to everyone who requests it for a good purpose. Let me know if you have some suggestions on how to make this clearer? (The step-by-step guides already include the "organize a pilot project" step before approval that might be relevant here.) Micromanagement is certainly not our aim but we will try to be aware of it in our daily activities to avoid it. (The linked new drafts contain the same level of management by Chapcom as the documents governing chapters, so this is something we have to assess and work on externally from these documents.) Best regards, Bence > > > On 20 June 2012 14:41, Bence Damokos <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am not sure if this list is still active, but I thought if there is >> anyone left, they might be interested to help out. >> >> Currently, the Chapters/Affiliations Committee is considering the >> procedural elements needed for processing applications for the new types of >> affiliates, the actual substance of the process largely depend on the >> requirements and definition we use. >> >> I would appreciate if you could take a look at a number of wiki pages I >> have started [based on the similar pages for chapters and the conclusions >> of this group] and provide feedback (which could range from "seems good" to >> suggestions and actual edits for changes). My aim is not to restart any >> debates that we have already concluded, rather to make sure that the >> documents created reflect the final consensus and nothing is left out and >> nothing controversial is added. >> >> - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Thematic_Organizations (if >> anyone can create a new map that shows the Amical regions, that would be >> appreciated, as well) >> - >> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_thematic_organization_creation_guide >> - >> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_thematic_organizations >> - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_User_Groups >> - >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_user_group_creation_guide >> - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requirements_for_future_user_groups >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> Best, >> Bence >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Movementroles mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles >> >> > > > -- > View Alan Walker's profile on LinkedIn > [http://fastalan.com] >
_______________________________________________ Movementroles mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
