Dear Fred, Nice to hear from you again!
On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:12, Fred Spiessens wrote: > BTW, any plans to clean up the object paradigm in OZ ? > I seem to remember the approach to objects in CTM was very good, but the > implementation is rather different. Can you be a bit more specific about "cleaning up"? I assume the goals concerning OOP could be somewhat different in the community. While I assume you would like to make Oz more secure (in the E sense), I would rather prefer the opposite. For example, I really need support for object reflection for my purposes: an objects needs to know its class, its attributes and the methods to access these attributes etc. I am currently doing that using some undocumented features of the Oz OOP implementation. I would really really *not* like that these are "cleaned up". Instead, I would prefer they become an official part of the OOP model. Best wishes, Torsten -- Dr Torsten Anders Course Leader, Music Technology University of Bedfordshire Park Square, Room A315 [email protected] http://strasheela.sourceforge.net http://www.torsten-anders.de _________________________________________________________________________________ mozart-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://www.mozart-oz.org/mailman/listinfo/mozart-hackers
