Re: PSM 2.0 (PIP) docs now available

[Ben Bucksch]

I should note that, IMO, it is a very good idea to make PSM in-process.

I saw a lot of complaints (5 or 10, including usenet posts) from Beonex 
Communicator users who ran ZoneAlarm and noticed that something from 
Beonex wanted to act as server. This is expecially a problem for a small 
and new distributor like Beonex. "Who knows, maybe PSM is some kind of 
BackOrifice?", users think. With PSM in process, I don't have to explain 
/ excuse myself anymore.

-- 
This post is protected by ROT0 encryption and the DMCA.
Reading is disallowed and will be prosecuted.