AFAIK, no part of mozilla's source is presently licensed under terms that say, in effect, "it's OK to use this source in any product that you give away for free, but not OK to use this source in a product for which you charge." Do I have that right?
You are correct. Such a license is neither Free nor Open Source.
Would it be acceptable for some part of mozilla to depend on code that is licensed under terms like those? (I suspect not.)
No. To clarify: I was making a general point about acceptable licenses, not commenting on the license of Berkeley DB (about which I have no knowledge) or any other product.
Gerv _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
