On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 00:29:23 +0000, Ian G wrote: > Simon Anderson wrote: > >>A CA which has demonstrated mistakes in the past should not receive >>preferential treatment. >> >>[Commercial CA + Webtrust + errors] should not outweigh [Community CA + no >>errors.] >> >> > > Time == track record == errors. > > !track record == !errors.
CA-Cert has (despite your assertion to the contrary) been operating for two years, during which time there has been no equivalent error. In an equivalent time since conception, Verisign had errors where CA-Cert has not. So if you were to take a moment to compare apples with apples and set aside your anti-free bias, you would conclude that CA-Cert has the better track record. But of course this is a pointless discussion. People such as yourself and others in and around the MF have made (and will continue to make) absurd statements to continuously 'shift the goal posts' in favour of commercial CAs and to the disfavour of community CAs. For this reason, CA-Cert is wasting it's time and scant resources jumping though endless hoops pursuing browser inclusion with MF. -Simon. _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
