Frank Hecker wrote:

You didn't suggest possible language for the next draft, but here's some:


Right, I though I was so far out on a limb already
that I'd better stop sawing ;)


  8. By "independent third party" we mean a person or other entity who
     is not affiliated with the CA as an employee or director, and for
     whom at least one of the following statements is true:

     * the party is not financially compensated by the CA;
     * the nature and amount of the party's financial compensation by
       the CA is fully and publicly disclosed; or
     * the party is bound by law, regulation, and/or a professional code
       of ethics to render an honest and objective judgement regarding
       the CA.


I think that works for now.  This is a "new" area,
and I'm fighting the temptation to dive in and
really get it right, because I suspect that we are
well past the diminishing returns at this point,
and the future experiences will be worth much
more than anything we can create in these
laboratory settings.

(David, do you have any thoughts, being rather
closer to this coalface?)


iang

--
News and views on what matters in finance+crypto:
       http://financialcryptography.com/

_______________________________________________
mozilla-crypto mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto

Reply via email to