Taking stock a little, Frank is asking for some input into whether his suggestions for a draft 12 will be adequate.
(I would say they are fine; my objections were mostly theoretical, and the sky doesn't fall down if they are ignored.)
What it really means is - reading between the lines here - is that Frank wants to be able to efficiently complete the policy and present it to the board as the recommended and consensus-based compromise. But he doesn't want to do that and then have a bunch of discussions over points and intentions and expectations occur *before the board*.
Which is fine and efficient; the idea is to present the consensus, not expect the board to discover that there is no consensus, or that there is still wide- spread disagreement.
So are we at the point where the changes that Frank has suggested are acceptable? Or is there still a grave degree of concern with even those changes and the resultant draft 12?
iang _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
