Nelson B wrote: > The alternative is to try many things and get many other people to examine > the results and report which results are standards-compliant and which ones > are not. This approach is not one I would expect from a certificate > AUTHORITY who wants to be listed among the trusted certificate AUTHORITIES.
Any excuse to keep us out right? If you hadn't noticed none of us are being paid for this and so we only have limited amounts of free time to actually do such in-depth and comprehensive research, although you'd think the guys from the DOE could get it right given their huge budgets and actually having paid employees and all... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." _______________________________________________ mozilla-crypto mailing list [email protected] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-crypto
