Hi Ian,

> Then, logically, a *.TLD cert indicates a valid
> wildcard range of addresses, and is therefore
> an identity, albeit a broad one.  But, given that
> CAs who have nothing to do with TLDs can
> then issue a wildcard covering an entire TLD,
> I'd be inclined to say that a political not technical
> decision should be made that a *.TLD be treated
> as a special case that gets a special treatment.
Any decent CA should block a *.tld cert, even a *.d1.tld as well, where d1
is a 'generic one'. For example it would be almost just as bad to issue
*.co.uk or *.com.au as *.net. The list of these domains is pretty long and
isn't exactly static.

Cheers,

V.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to