"Leonardo Curros Berm�dez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi� en el
mensaje news:aso4hm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It�s something estrange
> because when it�s only doing query
> ./ldasearch -b "o=ggc" 'bid=100000*'
> if i do another query if runs perfectly (bid is a non standar attribute
with
> all indexes).
> and i have probed it before replication ant it happens the same thing.
> I try to reimport many times the ldif, but the query persists very slow
(and
> only there are 4 entries with that filter).
>
> I read about nsslapd-allidsthresold and my inicial value was 4000.
> I increased it to 16000 and then reimport and it seems i have do nothing,
> because in log i see notes=U
> This is the acces log for the consult:
>
>         [05/Dec/2002:18:57:14 +0100] conn=9 op=0 SRCH base="o=ggc" scope=2
> filter="(bid=10000*)" attrs=ALL
>         [05/Dec/2002:19:01:38 +0100] conn=9 op=1 UNBIND
>         [05/Dec/2002:19:01:38 +0100] conn=9 op=1 fd=27 closed - U1
>         [05/Dec/2002:19:01:38 +0100] conn=9 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=101
> nentries=4 etime=264 notes=U
>
> And the notes=U appears too.
>
>
> "Rich Megginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi� en el mensaje
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Leonardo Curros Berm�dez wrote:
> >
> > >Hello,
> > >i have configured two instantces of NDS 6.11
> > >and replicated both (master-master).
> > >I have first used to initialice inicial server one ldif with 300.000
> > >entries,
> > >after i configure replica. At this moment searchs are fast (if i user
> > >indexed attributes in filters).
> > >
> > >After this, I test it doing massive ldapdelete,ldapmodify and ldapadd.
> > >Now when i do a query using a filter with indexed attributes, it takes
so
> > >long and
> > >administrative timelimit is passed. It seems like index don�t
regenerate.
> > >Is this normal?
> > >
> > No.  The indexes definitely regenerate.  You should probably check your
> > access log to see what the etime (elapsed time) is for your searches,
> > and also check the notes to see if you are running into the all IDS
> > threshold or doing unindexed searches.
> >
> > >
> > >thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>



Reply via email to