My thoughts:
> 1) Many pages are not W3C HTML compliant (and I think this includes the
> wrapper)
My thoughts on this are that the wrapper, and (say) the top 30 pages on
the http://www.mozilla.org/webalizer/ mostfreq list for this month, plus
all project homepages should be made compliant. As Ben said, fixing the
lot is too much work, but we should do the high profile ones.
Any volunteers for rewriting the wrapper? I don't know nearly enough about
HTML and CSS. Ideally, we want something that shows off Mozilla, yet
degrades gracefully, and separates the wrapper from the wrapped.
> 2) It's very hard to find what you want
New thread started.
> 1) It's a very "big" problem (336Mb, 30,716 files)
This is actually wrong. I counted two copies, due to CVS checkout problems
;-) It's half that size - 170Mb.
> 5) It's in CVS, so it's not quite as easy as moving a few files around
Asa is of the view that we might want to ditch CVS, as it raises the
barrier to entry. I don't know (yet) whether I agree with him. I think we
need to think very hard before ditching it and, if we do, FTP upload will
be the replacement - there's no point replacing one complex system with
another.
Gerv
