Thanks all for the feedback over the weekend. I have most of it incorporated into a new version of the document, and I am checking with the authors/suppliers of the sniffing code about those comments. Among other things, I have removed my xemacs-generated mailto from the bottom, as Gervase suggested :^|, This document is really a smorgasborg of different notes we have lying around, especially Eric's standards stuff. I will post the updated version of this document in mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/, but please continue to offer suggestions and updates here if you see anything. -ian Zach Lipton wrote: > Once we have a final version of this page, email [EMAIL PROTECTED], > Eric at (I am not sure) and me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blake is the owner of > the evangelism component and I am the qa contact. I was working on getting > an evangelism site up and running and this will really help. > > Zach > > in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gervase Markham at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/17/00 4:50 PM: > > >>> Not only that, the code doesn't take into account the possibility that >>> there might be other standards-compliant browser with ECMAScript and DOM >>> support in addition to those that identify themselves as "Netscape". >> >> Why not use the Netscape Ultimate Browser Sniffer? Testing for browsers >> using if (document.all) and if (document.layers) is Considered Harmful. >> >> Gerv
