fantasai wrote: <snip> > Anyhow, for comparison, I have put up what, as far as I can tell from > these posts, you want for the directory structure: > http://fantasai.tripod.com/Mozilla/2000/reorg-new.txt not sure if i'm adding these comments to the right palce in the thread but: i don't like quality living under documents. it doesn't seem logical that quality is a kind of documentaion. it is more of a project than it is a document. i don't like it under projects either since it spans projects. i think it belongs at the same level as projects and docs or (my second choice) in the projects directory. --Asa
- Re: New Structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
- Re: New Structure Simon P. Lucy
- Re: New Structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: New Structure Simon P. Lucy
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure Asa Dotzler
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
- Re: New Structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
- Re: New Structure fantasai
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
- Re: New Structure Matthew Thomas
- Re: New Structure Gervase Markham
