[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> 
> ?????????:
> ?????????????,??????????,???????????......
> 
> ??????????10??????,
> ???????????????????
> ?????????????,
> ????????????????,
> ?????????????????????
> ??????,???,?????????,
> ???????????????????
> 
> ?????????????????,?????????,??????????
> ????????????????????????????
> ??????????,??????????????????????!
> 
> ???????????
> 
> ???????????? http://uuu.to/liveism <http:/uuu.to/liveism>
> 
> ????????????:
> 
> ??:??? http://uuu.to/liveism <http:/uuu.to/liveism> 
> ??????:   
> 8?29????(???)  
> 9?04????  
> 9?12????  
> 9?18????  
> 9?24????  
> ????: 18:30 ~ 21:30  
>  
>  
> ??:??? http://uuu.to/???? 
> 8?30???? 
> 9?05???? 
> 9?11????  
> 9?17???? 
> 9?25????  
> ????: 18:30 ~ 21:30 
>   
>   
> ??:??? http://2rd.com/super2100 
> ??????:   
> 8?31????  
> 9?06????  
> 9?14????  
> 9?19????  
> 9?27????  
> ????: 18:30 ~ 21:30  
> ??:??????195?7?  
>   
>   
> ??:??? http://2rd.com/super2100
> ??????: 
> 9?13???? 
> 9?26???? 
> ???????2?
> 
> ??.??,??.????????TEL:04-23165310 FAX:04-23165315 ????
> ??.??.???????TEL:07-8628393 FAX:07-8628393 ????
> 
> 
Interesting. Should the Tate Gallery buy this as "modern art"?




Reply via email to