> It *can* be. Which doesn't mean that it is. You know and I know and > everyone here knows that the process is often out of sight, out of mind. > How many docs are there now on mozilla.org that were put up half done > and are still half done *years* later.
But that's a matter of manpower, not one of process. An r=/sr= system would mean those documents would instead by stuck somewhere on someone's hard drive. >> - bad documentation (while it's still in development) hurts no-one > > Depending on how you define "hurts" I don't think this is true. The > people most likely to *read* the docs are the ones who need the > information, not the ones who already know it and want to make sure that > what's written in the doc is right. And getting the wrong information > can make a body miserable. It can be marked as "unreviewed (in a peer-review sense) perhaps. We definitely need a document state _tagging_ system. >> - Docs can be changed at any time by anyone who sees a mistake > > The problem, of course, is deciding what constitutes "a mistake". It's surely more clear in technical documentation than it is in a novel :-) Gerv
