Bamm Gabriana wrote:
>>moz.zope.org _might_ be the next iteration of the mozilla.org website. >>At least that's what the developers (mainly fantasai and I) hope. >> >>It has a lot of advantages (low entry barrier, community features like >>discussion, ...) and a few disadvantages (lack of CVS blame and version >>control, at least for the moment). >> >>It works on a Zope server with a CMF and the Plone portal installed. We >>are just customizing it for mozilla.org. >> > > Really cool site, and *really* cool source (no tables!)... it would be nice > if you put in more code that works only in Mozilla but not in IE, such as > the css-only-and-no-javascript cascading menus. > We are still working on the usability, so cool stuff comes later. > On the other hand the site should still look good in IE (even without the > cool effects) otherwise it might put off prospective converts. Currently, > hovering over the main buttons on top do not look good in IE and > makes it look like an amateurish site to those that don't have the > luxury of viewing it in Mozilla - it becomes white and stays that way > for a few seconds even if the mouse has been removed. > Yes we know it works _well_ only in Mozilla, it works in IE (though doesn't look as good), and NS4 is a near disaster. Hopefully we'll get to that problem pretty soon, but the usability (being able to add/edit content, etc..) is currently the priority. > I guess this is like of reverse-evangelization. We tend to forget (including > me) that there are people who view our sites that aren't lucky enough to > be using Moz. > Not forgotten... just not top-priority right now. -Fabian. > > >
