Alexander J. Vincent wrote: > This is an idea I've been having over the last few days, but I'm not > sure it's a good one. > > I've been thinking that a lot of our raw info for docs may be in > Bugzilla. So the idea came to me to have an e-mail address field in > Bugzilla specifically for a documentation contact for that bug. > > Kinda like how there's a default QA and a default bug owner for a > particular component, there might want to be a default documenter. > > One of the reasons I fear making this suggestion is someone deciding to > make the default doc'r for any component lacking a default doc'r be me... > > I know bugspam can be somewhat of a pain for those who receive it, and I > know it has a deleterious effect on the system that sends it (which is > why Dawn Endico has locked a few high-cc bugs, if I remember right). But > it is my duty to raise ideas that may help documentation, even if I > think they are a bit insane. > > Alex
IMO it's a good idea. But I don't know how difficult it is to change bugzilla that way (shouldn't be to hard?).
