Daniel Wang wrote: > > > Document Type: enumerated, 'type' > > how about just leave it blank for undefined?
right > > > process > > design > > how would the <meta>s look like? mm.. how about <meta name="archetype" content="[type]"> or <meta name="doc-archetype" content="[type]"> ? > > code > huh? Detailed code documentation, like http://mozilla.org/newlayout/doc/block-and-line.html If you've got a better name, I'm open to suggestions. :) > don't think there's a need for this. should be obvious from <link rev> > links. <link> is for indicating relationships between documents, not for establishing a property of the current document. So, using <link> to link to code paths is right -- but using <link> to say that the current document is a FAQ is not. ~fantasai
