Joe Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Just wondering what the actual goal is of composer? I mean, in terms of > > composer being a good dev-environment, it's horrible. TopStyle is > > currently my favored dev tool- the way they deal with css and properties > > is just amazing. > > The original goal of Composer was a mom&pop, don't know anything about > html or css, wysiwyg web page composition tool. It was not targetted at > web developers. > > Daniel Glazman's work is improving Composer's usefulness for web > developers. > > Whatever your outlook, you get double your money back if you don't like > it. >
Hallo! Joe, i think your opinion is wrong. The composer might not comparable with programms like Dreamweaver but there is for example a lot of sence using composer to introduce pupils to web - programming! In this way persons come in touch with open source and mozilla! I hope Daniel Glazman will go on with his work! greetings from Austria (not Australia :-)) Kant P.S.: It would be nice having the possibility editing frames!!! ...
