I'm still not understanding something that may well be important.  

> > Could someone tell me where to look to find out why </p> is used 
> > at all?  I've never been able to see any difference whatsoever 
> > in the appearance of a file when I delete all the </p>s.
> 
> In HTML as child of SGML you may leave them out as short cut, but not 
> each HTML parser is a real SGML parser, so they do not implement short cuts.

I think what I'm wondering is what a parser that didn't deal with short cuts would do 
with my HTML page that has no </p> on it.  I don't understand why <p> should be 
any different from <br> -- which, unless I'm missing something big time, doesn't have 
a </br> associated with it.  What is it that </p> _does_, or _enables_?

-- Russ

_______________________________________________
mozilla-editor mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-editor

Reply via email to