hi!
what is the politics concerning which applications get standalones (like firefox, thunderbird (with extensions like calendar for thunderbird..)..) and which don't but are only available in mozilla? is the editor available as a standalone?
Everything (but chatZilla?) exists as standalone. Only the browser & e-mail clients are mature enough for daily use, IMO.
if i'd like to have: browser,
Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
email with calendar (to keep track of birthdays)
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
Sunbird: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird.html
and a .. composer/editor
NVU: http://www.nvu.com/download.html
Composer (not very up-to-date): http://webperso.easyconnect.fr/danielglazman/composer/composer++.html
what would your advise be?
Try them! :)
get the standalones or get the mozilla packet?
My preference: standalones (cleaner UI; if one crashes, it doesn't take the others down with it; the standalones is where most development is happening)
are there extensions available for mozilla as well?
The suite has XPI installable "extensions" too, IIRC.
-- Regards,
Peter Lairo _______________________________________________ mozilla-editor mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-editor
