http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46848
Suggests that nsIWebBrowser be the root of all listener registration.
Since filing this, Adam Lock has voiced some concern over it's legitimacy.
Here's nsWebBrowser's impl of the listener registration methods
(http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/embedding/browser/webBrowser/nsWebBrowser.cpp#136)
and as best I can tell, the array of listeners never gets used.
Currently anyone wanting "progress" adds specific listeners (URIContent,
webprogress) through explicit methods hanging off of webbrowser, or we
rely on their objects implementing certain interfaces. This seems a bit
sloppy to me, and thus I'm inclined to support the root registration
methods (and to fix 46848).
Adam, can you voice why you believe 46848 should be invalidated?
Jud
