Did Tracy already respond? If so this is duplicate info: Tracy and I
working up a webpage which will describe the 4 tests more fully and include
links to the various graphs of interest. This should make the results more
meaningful.
In the meantime, the first two tests are based on a list of 41 urls which
are static and available in-house. In both cases we run the list 3 times
through which makes for a total of 123 hits. For the first test we order
the urls frim greatest memory user to least memory user. The second test
orders them just the opposite.
The other two tests both consist of hitting one over and over again 100
times. So, Test 3 does this with page which includes just text, i.e., a
very low memory consumer. Test 4 uses the biggest memory consumer we have
available in our bevy of static in-house urls--i.e. www.iplanet.com--to do
the same.
Curt
Marc Attinasi wrote:
> I'm curious: why are ther different numbers of URL's for the graphs? The
> firsth two have ~125 and the last two have ~100. Aren't all of the runs
> uding the same top100.txt list? Does this skew the KB/URL calculation?
>
> - marc
>
> Tracy Walker wrote:
>
> ? Static41x3 Greatest to Least:
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ? Static41x3 Least to Greatest:
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ? Static_vanillaX100
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ?
> ? Static_iplanetX100:
