Brendan Eich wrote:
> ...
> Shouldn't these be attributes (i.e., don't you want to support getting
> the default and override c.s.e. values)?
Done.
> How about doc comments for doxygen and future javadoc-style comment
> extraction goodness.
Hum, yes documentation.
> Are atoms the right type for the c.s.e. names? Would scripts want to
> call this interface? Color me curious, not anti-atom.
String for the charsets and enums/constants for the "where the CS came from" values
Thanks for the suggestions