On 10/29/01 6:43 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Jeff Hume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it wasn't me that posed the question, I just replied to it. But I > would think that it would be better/easier to embed the mach-o bits in a > cocoa app rather than a carbon one. And I think making it embeded in > carbon instead of cocoa would be a step backwards instead of forwards. > > Jeff It would seem to me that not only would embedding mach-o bits in Carbon be backwards, it might not work. FizillaMach depends heavily on OS X's UNIX heritage (from what I've read on the project page), which Carbon doesn't share - Carbon (to my limited knowledge) is purely Apple/Mac APIs that have been trimmed down a bit to get rid of the sludge that has accumulated over the years. Make sense? If not, then I'm probably wrong :)
