Kyle A. Miller wrote:
> Both browsers have the challenge of being multiplatform. Yet, Opera 5 is resource
>friendly, fast, and pretty standards compliant. I try to use K-Meleon as a benchmark
>as to what Mozilla can be
> without all the frills and more. Even it isn't as fast as Opera. With Mozilla being
>open source, the development team is larger. Has more brought us less?
I'm not sure how closely you have been following this project (or Opera
for that matter) but one critical variable you didn't include in your
equation is that Mozilla is not even 1.0 software. But we are getting
better as we approach that point. If you don't have time to look into
performance problems yourself, filing bugs, contributing patches, etc.
then come back when we get to Mozilla 5.0 and ask your questions again.
-Asa
