> I do not see any mention, here, of "fair use rights". Some explanation is
> in order, therefore, to justify your claim that this provides for fair use
> rights.
My point is that (as I see it) they realised that fair use provisions were
necessary, but also that they would vary somewhat from country to country.
So, they left that nice "loophole" for people to implement them while
still complying with the convention. But others may have a different view.
> I just read the UCC in its entirety, and nowhere does it mention so-called
> "fair use rights".
>
> It also seems to me to be a difficult leap to go from fair use provisions,
> where specific uses are permitted, to mandating that an author must
> facilitate such uses.
Yeah, OK, that's true :-) Anyway, we are wildly off-topic. Are there any
other queries you have relating to your use of Mozilla?
Gerv
