Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > I will. Open "Mozilla at one", save as "Mozilla at three". Add a
> > section on the insane decision to release the completely unusable and
> > embarrassing Netscape 6.
>
> Not the responsibility of mozilla.org.
>
Well, then why are we in NETSCAPE.public.MOZILLA.general?
> > Replace "Mozilla on small devices" section
> > with a "Mozilla in under 25MB and 10 seconds" section ("There is much
> > excitement in the press and elsewhere over the prospects for Mozilla
> > displaying a blank page at the same time as one other app is running on
> > the latest, totally tricked-out hardware...".
>
> /me notes embedding tarball is 5Mb.
>
And what's its runtime memory usage to display a blank page?
> > Add a section apologizing
> > for the nonsensical decision to interpret the user interface from ASCII
> > text,
>
> KDE 2 does it as well (I learnt last night.) It's not just us.
>
Oh I agree completely, there's no shortage of folks around that are
making bad decisions. But if all your friends decided to implement an
interpreted-from-ASCII-text GUI, would you jump off that same bridge?
> > and attempting to explain why people are reinventing every UI
> > wheel in sight.
>
> Blame the W3C and CSS 2 :-)
>
For making the Mozilla project not use Windows' perfectly good tree
control and instead implement their own, for instance? Did the W3C
force you to do that?
> Gerv
